web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...
Unanswered

Net Income Comparison

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by

Hello:

Net Income in Management Reporter ties out perfectly to the Ending Balance shown in GP's Trial Balance, as long as the GP's Trial Balance is based on the natural segment range 4000 - 9999 just as Management Reporter's Net Income row is based.

But, the end user says that they do not use this range in GP's Report Options window.  Instead, they use 1100 - 3000.  As odd as this seems to me, they say that they have been using this range for sixteen years and that it has tied to Management Reporter's presentation of Net Income up until last month.

Truthfully, though, we ran the GP Trial Balance for last month and for months prior to last month and it does not tie.

Again, Net Income is only matching between the two apps as long as GP uses 4000 - 9999 just as Management Reporter does.

Well, instead of reinventing the wheel by changing GP's report option which the end user does not want to do, what else could account for the $130k+ discrepancy between the GP Trial Balance and the Management Reporter balance sheet for Net Income for last month?

Thanks!

John

Categories:
I have the same question (0)
  • Greg Byer Profile Picture
    2,588 on at

    Hi John,

    Are you saying that they use a range of 1100 to 3000 in their GP report and use a range of 4000-9999 in the MR report, and the two reports are supposed to tie out?  I don't see how that could be possible given that the reports are using a different range.  If the change the account range in the MR report to be 1100 to 3000, does that match the GP report then?  

  • Community Member Profile Picture
    on at

    Hi Greg:

    That's exactly right - they use a range of 1100 - 3000 in GP but a range of 4000 - 9999 in MR.

    They didn't want me to test changing MR to use 1100 - 3000.

    The only reason that I can think of is if they are trying to "back into" the calculation of Net Income in MR with the total of Assets, Liabilities, and Retained Earnings in GP.

    John

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Season of Sharing Community Challenge Launch!

Jump in, show your community spirit, and win prizes!

Women in Power Builds Momentum

Expanding mentorship, skilling, and AI innovation

Congratulations to the May Top 10 Community Leaders

These are the community rock stars!

Leaderboard > Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, AX, GP, SL

#1
Abhilash Warrier Profile Picture

Abhilash Warrier 658 Super User 2026 Season 1

#2
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 632 Super User 2026 Season 1

#3
Giorgio Bonacorsi Profile Picture

Giorgio Bonacorsi 570

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans