Skip to main content

Notifications

Microsoft Dynamics NAV (Archived)

Positive Pay Data Exchange Definition-Replace Transformation Rule

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by Microsoft Employee

Based on the bank specifications, a printed check needs to have a Transaction Code of 320 and a voided check a Transaction Code of 370 (Transaction Code is the name of the column given by the bank). I have been testing the Transformation Rule to replace the system created Record Type Code for an issued and voided check to the appropriate Transaction Code. For example, by default an issued check will have a Record Type Code of “O”, I want to replace this to 320. Using the Transformation Rule, I am able to successfully, update the Transaction Code.

My problem is that when exporting the Positive Pay file, I receive an error that the Record Type field does not have the length that is required. In the error, my expected field length is 3, but the actual is 5. I then updated the field length to 5 in the Data Exchange Definition. I received a similar error message when running the export that the actual length is greater than the expected.

Only until I enter a length of 15 am I able to successfully export the Positive Pay file. The Positive Pay file includes the correct Transaction Code value, however, there is 12 character gap until the next column value. The field length should only be 3 characters according to the bank specifications. My question is, how can I setup the Data Exchange Definition to successfully display the correct Transaction Code and use only 3 characters?

*This post is locked for comments

  • mscottbeaton Profile Picture
    mscottbeaton 5 on at
    RE: Positive Pay Data Exchange Definition-Replace Transformation Rule

    You'll need to daisy-chain transformation rules. Add a "next rule" reference for a second rule that changes "V" to "370".

  • Community Member Profile Picture
    Community Member Microsoft Employee on at
    RE: Positive Pay Data Exchange Definition-Replace Transformation Rule

    Did you ever get this file setup properly? I am trying to do the same thing, convert transaction codes to 320 and 370. I setup a transformation rule to convert normal check from code O to 320. I do not see how I can add a second rule for the voided checks. 

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Announcing Our 2025 Season 1 Super Users!

A new season of Super Users has arrived, and we are so grateful for the daily…

Vahid Ghafarpour – Community Spotlight

We are excited to recognize Vahid Ghafarpour as our February 2025 Community…

Congratulations to the January Top 10 leaders!

Check out the January community rock stars...

Leaderboard

#1
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 291,979 Super User 2025 Season 1

#2
Martin Dráb Profile Picture

Martin Dráb 230,848 Most Valuable Professional

#3
nmaenpaa Profile Picture

nmaenpaa 101,156

Leaderboard

Featured topics

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans