web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Notifications

Announcements

No record found.

Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, ...
Suggested Answer

Project item consumption ledger postings - Investment projects

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 30

Hi community,

Is there any financial / system "reason" why the Project Management and Accounting module does the additional 2 ledger postings when posting an item journal?

If an Investment project is configured to post to "Balance" for all transactions (on the project group) and line property = capitalise, I'd expect a simple debit "WIP" and credit "Stock control" posting, like you'd be getting with posting expense (i.e. debit "WIP" and credit "AP" etc.) or hour journals (i.e. debit "WIP" and credit "clearing").

But the ledger postings for item consumption are:

  • (1) Debit: Project - WIP cost - item (BS account)
  • (2) Credit: Project - cost item (PL account)
  • (3) Debit: Project - cost (PL account)
  • (4) Credit: Stock issue (BS Account)

Why is the in/out posting of #2 and #3 (from above) happening specifically for an item journal on Balance setting? - is it some "financy" reason? (apologies, I'm not an accountant)

I know you can choose not the capitalise the transaction (by toggling the line property accordingly) in which it would be expensed at posting - which makes sense, but then you'd expect the same behaviour for expense or hours journals...

Thanks,

AM

I have the same question (0)
  • Suggested answer
    Ludwig Reinhard Profile Picture
    Microsoft Employee on at

    Hi AM,

    I don't know the reasoning behind those additional postings.

    This is how D365FO resp. the previous AX versions behaved and I think MS never thought about changing it as long as this additional posting does not do any harm.

    Do you see a specific problem with those additional posting lines?

    Best regards,

    Ludwig

  • AM81 Profile Picture
    30 on at

    Hi Ludwig,

    Thanks for the response and no there's no problem with those additional postings - it's more a question of why (as clients pose this question as well and a "it's just the way it is" response is not good enough in my opinion).  

    And yes, historically it's always been like this since back in the AX days.

    Regards,

    Arno

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Responsible AI policies

As AI tools become more common, we’re introducing a Responsible AI Use…

Neeraj Kumar – Community Spotlight

We are honored to recognize Neeraj Kumar as our Community Spotlight honoree for…

Leaderboard > Finance | Project Operations, Human Resources, AX, GP, SL

#1
Martin Dráb Profile Picture

Martin Dráb 451 Most Valuable Professional

#2
André Arnaud de Calavon Profile Picture

André Arnaud de Cal... 428 Super User 2025 Season 2

#3
BillurSamdancioglu Profile Picture

BillurSamdancioglu 239 Most Valuable Professional

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard

Product updates

Dynamics 365 release plans