I have found what looks is inconsistent behaviour in the details populated into the sales order line /price details/, when the user taking the order belongs to a call centre.
My understanding is the section /trade agreement/ under /price details/ is meant to reflect the trade agreement details in full which were used to determine the /sales order unit price/
However if I have an agreement set up for an item where the combinations in the agreement lines has say an agreement for /site/ & another line for a combination of /site & warehouse/ for Example
Product A, Site 1, price $20
Product A, Site 1, WHS 2, Price $19
If a sales order is created for site 1 & whs 2 by
- a user not attached to a call centre, the price details trade agreement section specifies the /correct price and also references the related dimensions of site & warehouse
- a user attached to a call centre, the price details trade agreement section specifies the /incorrect price and does not reference dimensions of site & warehouse
If using Price Details for checking pricing selections, it appears to be missing critical details of site and warehouse required in the search of trade agreements to validate what pricing is being incorrectly referenced in the /price details/.
Note, sales line unit price looks correct, it is just the referenced price details that are not, when a user is attached to a call centre
The referencing differs purely based on whether a user is attached to a call centre or not.
Has anyone noticed this?
Has anyone reported the same issue?
Would it concern a client that price details trade agreement details are inaccurate and possibly incorrect?