Add On - Cash Management for Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2016

(0) Share

Report

Posted on by Community Member

On the request of our client, who does not want to use standard journals for preparing payment and receipt, we are looking for Add-on for Cash Management for Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2016. The add-on should provide simple process of Payment and Receipt with minimal no. of objects.

*This post is locked for comments

I have the same question (0)

All responses (5)

Answers (0)

Community Member on at

Like (0)

Report

Please share your findings with the community.

Others are interested as well.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Jens Glathe 6,092 on at

Like (1)

Report

"Minimal no. of objects" could be a problem. For example, gbedv OPPlus (widely used in germany) is around 450 objects, changed and unique. It has a "different" workflow than standard NAV payments, but one pretty well designed, and fast to get used to. What locale are we talking about?

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Community Member on at

Like (0)

Report

You mean the location of the Client, If yes, the Location is Nigeria.

Thanks

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Community Member on at

Like (0)

Report

What are you looking specific in Add On? Do you need anything related to WHT localisation in Nigeria or any specific automation and validatinos?

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Suggested answer

Rabin 2,976 on at

Like (0)

Report

Hello,

I would suggest Customization for the Module.

From your explanation i feel, the customer is not comfortable with the "UI" of the Cash management module. If you cannot convince the User to implement the process involved in the Cash Management then it may lead to certain logical problem where you might not get the intended posted data in reports later which can result in severe Accounting problems.

Hence the best solution from my side would be to customize the User Interface and make it simple to use(Simple in the sense, Interface wise what they were using in their past system).

Was this reply helpful? Yes No