Personalized Community is here!
Quickly customize your community to find the content you seek.
Choose your path Increase your proficiency with the Dynamics 365 applications that you already use and learn more about the apps that interest you. Up your game with a learning path tailored to today's Dynamics 365 masterminds and designed to prepare you for industry-recognized Microsoft certifications.
Visit Microsoft Learn
2020 Release Wave 2Discover the latest updates and new features to Dynamics 365 planned through March 2021.
Release overview guides and videos Release Plan | Preview 2020 Release Wave 2 TimelineWatch the 2020 Release Wave 1 virtual launch event
Ace your Dynamics 365 deployment with packaged services delivered by expert consultants. | Explore service offerings
Connect with the ISV success team on the latest roadmap, developer tool for AppSource certification, and ISV community engagements | ISV self-service portal
The FastTrack program is designed to help you accelerate your Dynamics 365 deployment with confidence.
FastTrack Program | Finance TechTalks | Customer Engagement TechTalks | Upcoming TechTalks
I am attempting to set up a Positive Pay export for a customer of ours and they require a Routing No. and a Transaction No. to be present in the Positive Pay Export output. Since neither pertain to a field from the Positive Pay Detail table, which I am using for the Field Mapping, I created a Transformation Rule for both. I set the mapping for both lines to use the Account Number field, then used a Transformation Rule with a Transformation Type of Replace to change the Account Number value into the Routing No. in one rule and the Transaction No. in the other.
Upon exporting, no value appears for the Routing No. column, but the rule applied for the Transaction No. column worked. I had a developer apply Hotfix 379424 from Cumulative Update 8, this allowed the Transformation Rule to have an effect on the export output, but also led to the blank value for the Routing No. column to occur.
I have exported the Data Exchange Definition and imported it into a company database that is updated up to CU38. When I perform the Positive Pay Export, the Transformation Rule works correctly for the Routing No. column and the correct value appears in the export output file. I have looked through the Cumulative Update list and have not found any fix that corresponds with this issue.
Could someone point me to which hotfix needs to be utilized to correct this issue? Currently, the customer's database where the Positive Pay is being implemented is at CU5 and has the hotfixes of CU8 379318, CU12 380648, and CU13 381084. The hotfix 381212 from CU14 is not desired because the customer needs the commas in the amount column to be present when uploading.
Business Applications communities