Choose your path Increase your proficiency with the Dynamics 365 applications that you already use and learn more about the apps that interest you. Up your game with a learning path tailored to today's Dynamics 365 masterminds and designed to prepare you for industry-recognized Microsoft certifications.
Visit Microsoft Learn
2020 release wave 1Discover the latest updates and new features to Dynamics 365 planned through September 2020
Release overview guides and videos Release Plan | Preview 2020 Release Wave 1 Timeline
Ace your Dynamics 365 deployment with packaged services delivered by expert consultants. | Explore service offerings
Connect with the ISV success team on the latest roadmap, developer tool for AppSource certification, and ISV community engagements | ISV self-service portal
The FastTrack program is designed to help you accelerate your Dynamics 365 deployment with confidence.
FastTrack Program | Finance TechTalks | Customer Engagement TechTalks | Upcoming TechTalks
In my experience in the field, I’ve sometimes been asked. What is this performance test tool available in D365? What does it do? Is it safe for me to run it on my system, is it going to impact my environment and the users? How relevant are those results?
In this blog I will try to address some of these questions and present well … what exactly this test tool is, how it works, and what it’s used for.
The Performance Test tool is a tool that is available from within the D365 F&O client from within the System Administration module.
System Administration > Periodic Tasks > Run Performance Test
This tool basically allows you to run some very simple, controlled and repeatable test that will give you an indication on how long specific micro operations related to data retrieval and modification take.
From there you get a form that looks like this:
This basically allows you to configure a certain number of tests to be performed as well as a number of times you want those tests executed. Once you have set up your test click run and it will execute those tests.
Couple of things to know here. The more tests selected the longer this will take obviously.
The record count to test is a value that must be between 10 and 100 000 and it will be brought back to within those bounds if below/above.
If you’re looking to test something specific, you should disable most of the others.
Anyhow, with a setting of 1000, what will happen is that the tool will perform 1000 inserts into a table, then run through the other tests selected so … make 1000 updates on that table, perform 1000 selects on the clustered index, 1000 selects on the unique index, 1000 record set insert to a separate table, 1000 inserts to tempdb and so on and so forth.
As a recap, this is doing tests mostly related to database access (insert update select and delete) as well as accessing and manipulating the data within, tempdb, in memory tables and AOS cache, and doing all these operations as many times as you’ve specified.
After running the tool, you will get an output that looks like this:
Of course, the list here depends on the tests that were selected.
One thing to specify right off the bat, is that all the values provided here are in milliseconds (as stated on the first result but not repeated).
For every single test it corresponds to x (1000 in my example) operations. Though it is worth mentioning some things.
Inserts test is measuring the time to perform x times the insertion of 1 row … while recordlist and recordset tests are doing 1 operation affecting x rows.
Regarding the selects on clustered index, it is selecting 1 record 10 times and then the next until the total operations is x (so with 1000 we are testing 100 records). This is a hybrid test between SQL and AOS caching (unless caching has been disabled in the options), whereas the unique index cache hit is fully AOS record cache and the test without cache on unique index and non-unique index test are both fully going to SQL for each select.
As recap, we have discussed several different tests, some that are mostly just SQL, some that are pretty much AOS caching related and others that are hybrid.
It is important to understand what this test can help you with and what it cannot help you with.
First, this test is only running very lightweight queries, as many times as you specify.
As a result, this gives very little information on how powerful the SQL server is, but more how fast it can process multiple small queries, which is typically the type of workload you would expect from an ERP. It also means that you have control over how long the test is going to run, but that in any case, it will mostly have very little impact on the rest of the system.
This also means that a test like the insert … which requires very little work from the SQL server (typically less than 0.5 ms to actually do the insert) will give you a close look at the latency between that AOS and the SQL server if and only if the DTU on the SQL server and CPU on the AOS are very low when you run the test.
It is also a good test to compare the impact of high DTU, as if the server is under high DTU you might expect some additional waiting hence the that time would increase, and you can compare the results on high a low DTU.
On the contrary, a test like SGOC or cache hits should have no correlation to the SQL DTU … but those should be affected by AOS CPU.
So, if you want to see the effect of CPU on the AOS those are the tests you might want to run.
The SGOC test is a good test to see the impact of having lots of AOS as this needs to be written to all AOS.
This tool also provides a good insight on how much more efficient recordset operations are.
Apart from providing insights on how certain types of operations are affected by different kind of load, this also allows us to see the impact of the increasing the number of records.
For instance, you might want to compare 1000 rows with 10 000 rows, which will show you how these operations scale with the amount of records (linear? logarithmic? etc.)
On another note, and this is very important, this tool is not meant to compare one environment with another. There multiple reasons for that.
Different environments might have different number of AOS which will affect things like cache especially when it comes to SGOC.
Different environments might be in different Azure regions which might have different latency.
Different environment might have different sizing and different load.
If we look under the hood, the first thing I’d like to point out is that tool basically uses his own tables:
This tells us that the tool is not touching any transactional tables.
These are fairly simple tables with a couple of generic fields of different types:
If we look at little bit at how the tool works, we can see that those tables are cleaned before and after each test:
This ensures that before and after every test we guarantee that there no records left in those tables. The tables used by the tool only have data for as long as the test is running.
Then we are simply calling sequentially every single test that has been selected one at a time.
If we look at the detail of a given test here is what we can see.
We are simply starting a timer running the operation and stopping the timer and reporting the time it took to run the operation.
We can also see from the above that the data that is used in the table (I choose the 1st step doing the population on purpose) is simply basic data.
From the above we can see that the impact on the environment from running this test with a “small” value such as 1000 rows is pretty much minimal.
With that said, we’ve gone through:
I hope this was useful for you, this concludes this blog entry.
Premier Field Engineer
Business Applications communities